PRACTICE AREA

Fraud & public-fraud matters

Solicitation, money flows and each participant’s role, for complainants and accused persons.

A report of being scammed needs a verifiable account: who said what, when, and how that led to a payment.

The review separates statements before payment from later explanations, maps money movements and identifies who made each representation. Loss amounts or group size alone do not resolve the legal questions.

For an accused person, a clear account needs records of the actual role, decision-making authority, receipts and knowledge at each stage. The office does not accept conflicting roles in the same matter.

Matters for review

  • Investment solicitation and return schemes
  • Fraud and public-fraud evidence organisation
  • Factual preparation for a complaint or response
  • Assessing civil disputes alongside criminal issues

Documents to prepare

  • Complete chats and advertisements with account names and dates
  • Statements, transfer slips and recipient details
  • Agreements, receipts and your own chronology

Getting started

  1. Share a short summary and key dates.
  2. Review the records and the help you need.
  3. Discuss the approach and confirm scope before work starts.

Service questions

Do multiple victims automatically establish public fraud?

No. The representations, their dissemination and the requirements of the applicable offence must also be examined.

Should I preserve evidence if some money was returned?

Yes. Keep both outgoing and incoming payments and the stated purpose of each transaction.

Related reading

All insights

LET'S TALK

Start with your story

Bring the records you have and any important appointment or deadline.

LINE Call